<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>Learning News</title><atom:link href="https://learningnews.com/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" /><link>https://learningnews.com</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2026 14:27:42 GMT</pubDate><generator>Learning News RSS Generator</generator><description>Learning News</description><language>en</language><item><title>Why training improvement may be more useful than ROI</title><link>https://learningnews.com/news/coursecheck/2026/why-training-improvement-may-be-more-useful-than-roi</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2026 14:27:42 GMT</pubDate><guid>https://learningnews.com/news/coursecheck/2026/why-training-improvement-may-be-more-useful-than-roi</guid><content:encoded><![CDATA[ <img src="https://learningnews.com/media/56595/training-roi-vs-training-improvement.png">L&D teams are often under pressure to prove the value of training through ROI, but measuring financial return alone rarely leads to better learning outcomes. Here's why continuous improvement should come first.]]></content:encoded></item></channel></rss>