Free Online Resources Justify Government's ICT cuts
The government’s decision to abolish the education ICT agency Becta by November has been met with mixed view. The scrapping of the quango which promotes the use of technology in schools is part of cuts worth £6.2 billion in what Chancellor George Osbourne has called 'wasteful' public spending. While up to 240 jobs will go and it's services cut, many are asking if Becta will truly be missed.
The British Educational Communications and Technology Agency
(Becta) was established in 1998 with the objective of guiding the
strategic direction and development of national education policy to
best take advantage of technology. In its capacity, it oversees the
procurement of all ICT equipment and e-learning strategy for
schools.
The agency was part of the Labour's government's plans to bridge
the "digital divide" by ensuring all children have access to a
computer in their home. Becta encouraged secondary schools to
employ virtual learning environments so parents could monitor their
child's progress in the classroom. It also sought to arrange
framework agreements to ensure reasonable prices for ICT in the
classroom and among other things, provided laptops and broadband to
over 200,000 of Britain's poorest children.
While Becta's lofty ambitions of integrating ICT into every
classroom in the UK are commendable, things rarely matched their
original plans in reality.
The agency was originally mandated to make ICT more assessable to
the tech-naïve teacher by procuring hardware and infrastructure
from suppliers. Arrangements were made between Becta and IT
suppliers which left little in the way of input from schools. With
so little say in the decision making process, all too often schools
were left frustrated by inadequate technology not fit for its
purpose. The inability to source the required technology was
confirmed recently when Becta admitted that only one school in five
knew how to effectively utilise their new technology.
A further complaint over the agency was that their building
schemes were so inflexible that the technology was out of date by
the time schools opened. For example, often times prearranged
contracts between Becta and IT suppliers meant hefty fees had to be
paid to IT suppliers if even the most basic of new software was to
be installed. These exorbitant fees resulted in reluctance to
update software which forced the technology to become antiquated
very quickly.
As technology evolves at a lightning quick pace, downloading the
latest free software would have allowed schools to keep their
systems up to date. Instead large sums of money were profligately
used to upgrade systems. Becta also sourced expensive versions of
the latest e-learning software to create enhanced learning outcomes
in the classroom. However this proved to be ineffective and an
inefficient waste of funds as the majority of users were unable to
utilise the e-learning software.
Today there is a multitude of free high quality open source
software on the web which achieves the same objective as the
expensive software Becta procured. One website which provides free
online training courses is ALISON.com
ALISON recently forged
strategic partnerships with both the British Council and the Irish
Health Safety Authority and will soon pass the 500,000 in terms of
registered learners.
The website offers free interactive self-paced training courses
and certification in a wide variety of topics including ICT, Health
& Safety and Schools Curriculum. The resources are ideal for
students and teachers alike and as government funding in elearning
programmes in schools is axed, ALISON offer an ideal
substitute.